What I have learned is that Action Research could be considered as a protocol to address a problem in schools. It is designed to be built or developed from “toe” to “head” and with a vision to the future.
It is important to understand who it works, because every step established impact to the next one in the structure or to the following in time. If they are not properly prepared, documented, researched and inquired, the whole structure could be weak or the process is going to be poor in results.
So, none of these Setting the Foundation, Analyzing Data, Developing Understanding, Engaging in Self Reflection, Exploring Patterns, Determining Direction, Taking Action or Sustaining Improvement is most important than other. They complement each other, and perhaps are different because some steps require different kind of skills.
I think that once I have defined my Action Research Plan, I can start organizing my ideas and stop trying to find the solution before even knowing completely every edge of the problem. Some benefits of this approach is that the project leader has control during the different stages of the development, acquires a wider –but, at the same time a more detailed- view of the problem. Hence, it results in a more measurable and accurate solution.
References:
Dana, N.F. (2009). Leading with Passion and Knowledge: The Principal as Action Researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Harris, S., Edmonson, S., & Combs, J. (2009). Examining What We Do To Improve Our Schools: 8 Seps from Analysis to Action. Larchmont, N.Y.: Eye on Education.
I think you have done an excellent job with your action research plan. I specially like the timeline that you have provided, it is very thorough. I don;t think I would change anything on your action research plan. Maybe you could decribe more on how you would evaluate them, as in how would you utilize AESIT to work with testing.
ReplyDelete